Educational Paradigm in the Evaluation of Islamic Religious Education: Efforts to Balance Intellectual, Emotional, and Spiritual Intelligence
Keywords:
Assessment, Evaluation, Cognitive, Affective, PsychomotorAbstract
The primary essence of Islamic Religious Education lies in the holistic formation of individuals, encompassing not only intellectual capacities but also emotional and spiritual dimensions. However, empirical realities in educational practice often reveal an imbalance, in which academic (cognitive) assessment overwhelmingly dominates, while the evaluation of attitudes and skills is frequently neglected. This study aims to examine how State Senior High School 1 Tawangsari implements the evaluation of Islamic Religious Education based on a holistic education paradigm, to identify the challenges faced by educators in assessing the three domains of competence, and to formulate evaluation strategies that are more objective and sustainable. Using a qualitative approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews with Islamic Religious Education teachers and school management and were analyzed descriptively. The findings indicate that although there is an emerging commitment to the implementation of holistic evaluation, cognitive assessment remains highly dominant. This condition is largely attributed to technical constraints such as limited instructional time, large student–teacher ratios, and the absence of standardized non-cognitive assessment instruments. This study concludes by recommending the development of standardized affective and psychomotor assessment instruments so that the evaluation of Islamic Religious Education can transform from merely a tool for measuring academic achievement into a comprehensive instrument for fostering holistic Islamic character formation.
References
Arifin, Z. (2016). Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Prinsip, Teknik, dan Prosedur. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Fauzi, A., & Suryadi, A. (2021). Implementasi evaluasi berbasis HOTS dalam pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(2), 145–160.
Hakim, L. (2018). Pendidikan karakter dalam perspektif Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 15(1), 1–15.
Hamzah, A. (2019). Penilaian ranah psikomotorik dalam pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Tarbawi: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 87–98.
Hidayat, T., & Asyafah, A. (2020). Paradigma pembelajaran holistik dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 1–14.
Kunandar. (2015). Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2017). Panduan Penilaian oleh Pendidik dan Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Lestari, S., & Nurhayati, E. (2022). Problematika penilaian praktik ibadah dalam pembelajaran PAI. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Agama Islam, 14(1), 55–68.
Muhaimin. (2015). Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Mulyasa, E. (2018). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nata, A. (2019). Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Kencana.
Rahmawati, I. (2020). Evaluasi pembelajaran PAI berbasis afektif dan psikomotorik. Jurnal Tarbiyah, 27(2), 211–225.
Rahayu, S. (2022). Pengembangan instrumen HOTS dalam evaluasi PAI. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Indonesia, 7(1), 66–78.
Sari, D. P., & Maulana, I. (2021). Kendala penilaian sikap dalam pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 11(2), 173–185.
Sudijono, A. (2017). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Susanto, H. (2019). Pengaruh asesmen HOTS terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 10(1), 45–57.
Widoyoko, E. P. (2017). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Zainal Arifin. (2016). Konsep dan Model Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Nazarudin Said, Tino Kurniawan, Muhammad Fatahillah, Wahid Iskandar Setia Hutama, Muhammad Fikri, Nurul Latifatul Inayati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

PUBLICATION ETHICS
FOCUS AND SCOPE
EDITORIAL TEAM
REVIEW PROCESS
CONTACT US
AUTHOR GUIDELINES




