Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

Every manuscript submitted to ARRAZI: Scientific Journal of Health undergoes a rigorous review process:

  1. Initial Review

    • Manuscripts are screened by the Editorial Board to ensure compliance with journal guidelines and scope.

    • A plagiarism check is conducted using the designated plagiarism detection tool.

  2. Double-Blind Peer Review

    • This journal applies a double-blind review process, meaning that the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed from each other throughout the review.

  3. Review Criteria

    • Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on the relevance of the title, abstract, discussion, and conclusion.

    • The assessment also includes novelty, scientific contribution, methodological rigor, and appropriateness of references.

  4. Review Outcome

    • Based on reviewers’ recommendations, manuscripts may be accepted, revised, or rejected. Final decisions rest with the editorial board.