Pengalaman Anak Pertama Korban Perceraian Orang Tua dari Keluarga Ekonomi Rendah: Studi Fenomelogi Dampak Psikologi dan Strategi Koping
Keywords:
Parental Divorce, Coping Strategies, Psychological Impact, ResilienceAbstract
Parental divorce is a family event that can generate significant psychological impacts on children, particularly first-borns who often bear greater responsibilities within the family. This condition becomes more complex when accompanied by economic constraints. This study aims to describe the lived experiences, psychological impacts, and coping strategies employed by first-born children from low-income families affected by parental divorce. The study adopts a qualitative approach using a phenomenological method. The participants consisted of four first-born children aged 9–12 years at MI Al-Irsyad Al-Islamiyyah Banjarmasin, along with four teachers as supporting informants. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, non-participant observation, and documentation, and were analyzed using Moustakas’ phenomenological model. The findings reveal that children experience prolonged sadness, a sense of loss, difficulties in concentration, and a tendency to suppress emotions. The coping strategies employed include both emotion-focused and problem-focused coping. Social support, religiosity, emotional maturity, and a sense of responsibility serve as facilitating factors, while economic limitations, lack of emotional communication, and social stigma act as barriers.
References
Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 650–666.
Compas, B.E. et al. (2017) ‘Coping, emotion regulation, and psychopathology in childhood and adolescence’, Psychological Bulletin, 143(9), pp. 939–991.
Conger, R.D. et al. (2010) ‘Economic stress, coercive family process, and developmental problems of adolescents’, Child Development, 81(5), pp. 1561–1579.
Creswell, J.W. (2013) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2011) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 4th edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25(4), 485–496.
Hetherington, E. M., & Kelly, J. (2002). For better or for worse: Divorce reconsidered. New York: Norton.
Kelly, J.B. and Emery, R.E. (2003) ‘Children’s adjustment following divorce’, Family Relations, 52(4), pp. 352–362.
Lansford, J.E. (2009) ‘Parental divorce and children’s adjustment’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(2), pp. 140–152.
Lazarus, R.S. and Folkman, S. (1984) Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Masten, A.S. (2014) Ordinary Magic: Resilience in Development. New York: Guilford Press.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pargament, K.I. (1997) The Psychology of Religion and Coping. New York: Guilford Press.
Patton, M.Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Saraswati, R. (2021). Dinamika anak pertama dalam keluarga. Jakarta: Pustaka Psikologi.
Skinner, E.A. et al. (2003) ‘Searching for the structure of coping’, Psychological Bulletin, 129(2), pp. 216–269.
Smith, J.A., Flowers, P. and Larkin, M. (2009) Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. London: Sage.
Van Manen, M. (1990) Researching Lived Experience. New York: State University of New York Press.
Werner, E.E. (1995) ‘Resilience in development’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(3), pp. 81–85.
Yin, R.K. (2018) Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J. and Skinner, E.A. (2011) ‘Review: The development of coping’, Annual Review of Psychology, 62, pp. 69–92.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nadiah, Yudistita Fauzy Indrawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

PUBLICATION ETHICS
FOCUS AND SCOPE
EDITORIAL TEAM
REVIEW PROCESS
CONTACT US
AUTHOR GUIDELINES




